
Quadro
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro better than RTXA5000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTXA5000-8Q make more sense than Quadro?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro and RTXA5000-8Q

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

RTXA5000-8Q
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro scores 5,000 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro is built on Celsius while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 220 nm vs 8 nm.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+2% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Celsius | Ampere |
| Process Node | 220 nm | 8 nm |
| ROPs | 4 | 96+2300% |
| TMUs | 4 | 256+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-8Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7+212% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro launched at $1000 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The Quadro costs 60% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.0 (Quadro) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the Quadro offers 150% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 1999).
| Feature | Quadro | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-60% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+150% | 2.0 |
| Codename | NV10 | GA102 |
| Release | 1999 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #900 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













