
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
2010RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 460 OEM better than RTXA5000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTXA5000-8Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 460 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 OEM and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

RTXA5000-8Q
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM scores 5,000 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is built on Fermi while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 0.8736 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+2% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 8192+2338% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8736 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+3079% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 256+357% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 8 MB+1718% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 OEM draws 150W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-35% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.3+56% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 OEM | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GF104 | GA102 |
| Release | October 11 2010 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #829 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













