GeForce GTX 1630 vs RTXA5000-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1630

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1592.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
1566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1630

2022

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1592.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 230W, a 155W reduction.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
1566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌206.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1630 better than RTXA5000-8Q?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,992 vs 4,916 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1630 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (75W vs 230W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-8Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1630 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $150 MSRP. GeForce GTX 1630 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 1630 is about $2,350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. RTXA5000-8Q is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTXA5000-8Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1630?

Yes. RTXA5000-8Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $2,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1630. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1630 currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1592.4%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1630 Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-8Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	51 FPS	136 FPS
medium	34 FPS	116 FPS
high	26 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	107 FPS
medium	22 FPS	89 FPS
high	14 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	39 FPS
medium	12 FPS	35 FPS
high	8 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1630 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	171 FPS	221 FPS
medium	142 FPS	177 FPS
high	107 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	161 FPS
medium	86 FPS	125 FPS
high	68 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	77 FPS
medium	50 FPS	63 FPS
high	40 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1630 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	225 FPS	221 FPS
medium	180 FPS	177 FPS
high	150 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	168 FPS	166 FPS
medium	135 FPS	133 FPS
high	112 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	111 FPS
medium	90 FPS	88 FPS
high	75 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1630 Open RTXA5000-8Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	225 FPS	214 FPS
medium	180 FPS	175 FPS
high	150 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	168 FPS	151 FPS
medium	135 FPS	128 FPS
high	112 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	87 FPS
medium	72 FPS	72 FPS
high	63 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1630 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce GTX 1630

The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.

RTXA5000-8Q

The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
G3D Mark Score	4,992+2%	4,916
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	512	8192+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.828 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+1419%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+5%	1695 MHz
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1630	RTXA5000-8Q
TDP	75W-67%	230W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	66.6+211%	21.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 94% less ($2350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 1565% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).