G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

FirePro S9050

2014

RTXA5000-8Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTXA5000-8Q better than FirePro S9050?

Yes. RTXA5000-8Q is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,916 vs 4,901 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTXA5000-8Q is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while FirePro S9050 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-8Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTXA5000-8Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTXA5000-8Q is about 25.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,500 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. FirePro S9050 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is FirePro S9050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. FirePro S9050 is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 4,901 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro S9050 Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-8Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	104 FPS	136 FPS
medium	89 FPS	116 FPS
high	73 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	107 FPS
medium	80 FPS	89 FPS
high	58 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	39 FPS
medium	27 FPS	35 FPS
high	18 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	23 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	140 FPS	221 FPS
medium	108 FPS	177 FPS
high	86 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	161 FPS
medium	56 FPS	125 FPS
high	42 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	77 FPS
medium	20 FPS	63 FPS
high	16 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	51 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	221 FPS	221 FPS
medium	176 FPS	177 FPS
high	147 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	165 FPS	166 FPS
medium	132 FPS	133 FPS
high	110 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	111 FPS
medium	88 FPS	88 FPS
high	74 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	55 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open RTXA5000-8Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
1080p
low	183 FPS	214 FPS
medium	148 FPS	175 FPS
high	130 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	151 FPS
medium	107 FPS	128 FPS
high	94 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	87 FPS
medium	58 FPS	72 FPS
high	47 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	44 FPS

Open FirePro S9050 Open RTXA5000-8Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and RTXA5000-8Q

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

RTXA5000-8Q

The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q).

Feature	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
G3D Mark Score	4,901	4,916
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1792	8192+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+761%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	112	256+129%
L1 Cache	0.44 MB	8 MB+1718%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	6 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-8Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S9050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	6 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The FirePro S9050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S9050	RTXA5000-8Q
TDP	225W-2%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	21.8+2%	21.4

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The FirePro S9050 costs 20% less ($501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the FirePro S9050 offers 25% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).