
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌344.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,549 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro S9050
2014Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,549 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌344.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition better than FirePro S9050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does FirePro S9050 make more sense than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901 | 5,000+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S9050) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the FirePro S9050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The FirePro S9050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8+9% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition costs 77.5% less ($1549 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition offers 344% better value.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $450-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 11.1+344% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Amethyst |
| Release | August 7 2014 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #446 | #436 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












