
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
2025RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell better than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 709 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 126 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 925 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 730 FPS |
| high | 682 FPS | 656 FPS |
| ultra | 591 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 586 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 932 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 858 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 752 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 688 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 564 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 476 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 97 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,431 points.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 35,431 and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile reaches 35,929 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 10,496 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 50.53 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 82 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) with 328 Tensor cores vs 328.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35,431 | 35,929+1% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496 | 10496 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 50.53 TFLOPS+43% | 35.27 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+43% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 112 |
| TMUs | 328 | 328 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB | 10.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 82 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 328 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 1024 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (Blackwell) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Blackwell) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 95W — a 71.2% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 95W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 177.2 | 378.2+113% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












