
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 278% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅105.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 278% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅105.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 32.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 136 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 30,020+33% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 8960+106% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 25.66 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+77% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 280+106% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 8.8 MB+105% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 70+106% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 280+106% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 428.9+203% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 80% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 278.7% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+279% | 15.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GB203 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












