
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
2025Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌721.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 575W, a 505W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
2025RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 575W, a 505W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌721.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 better than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 591 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 944 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 772 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 698 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 907 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 684 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 778 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 684 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,399 points. Launch price was $2,299.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 scores 30,399 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition reaches 30,020 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 680 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,399+1% | 30,020 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+143% | 8960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+308% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz+68% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 680+143% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+142% | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+100% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170+143% | 70 |
| Tensor Cores | 680+143% | 280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+100% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+100% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 draws 575W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 156.6% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 70W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 650W-35% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-3% | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.9 | 428.9+711% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.2 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers 1.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2+1% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | GB203 |
| Release | August 15 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #15 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












