
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,001 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 666.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $3,001 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 666.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 27.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 184 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+28% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 10240+74% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+49% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 320+74% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 10 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 80+74% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 320+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 768 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 14% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-13% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+47% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 83.4% less ($3001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 661% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-83% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+661% | 5.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












