
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 230W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 192).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌109.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 110W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and RTX A5500

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 22,119 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 192 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,119+5% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 10240+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 320+67% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 10 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 80+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 320+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 110W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 70.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-52% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-67% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 201.1+119% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3600 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #47 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












