
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,201 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 868.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌802.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,201 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 868.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅135.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌802.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 7.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 136 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+7% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 10240+135% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+52% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 320+135% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 10 MB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 80+135% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 320+135% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-30% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+54% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 88.9% less ($3201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 862.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-89% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+863% | 5.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












