G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅12.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅31.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 256).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
24.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$3,721 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

RTX A5000

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $928 less on MSRP ($3,721 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (256 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

RTX A5000

2021

Why buy it

✅12.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅31.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 256).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $928 less on MSRP ($3,721 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A5000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
24.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$3,721 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (256 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than RTX A5000?

Yes. Quadro RTX A6000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, 336 vs 256 Tensor cores, and 48 GB vs 24 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A5000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A5000 is easier to justify on price alone at $3,721 MSRP, but Quadro RTX A6000 is still the stronger gaming card overall. Quadro RTX A6000 is about 24.9% more expensive on MSRP at $4,649 MSRP versus $3,721 MSRP, and you are getting 12.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (22,798 vs 22,951). RTX A5000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with Quadro RTX A6000 if you want the better experience; go with RTX A5000 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.

When does RTX A5000 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?

Yes. RTX A5000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (230W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $3,721 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX A6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX A6000 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (22,798 vs 22,951) and 12.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. RTX A5000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX A6000 Benchmark Check

RTX A5000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
1080p
low	270 FPS	178 FPS
medium	250 FPS	157 FPS
high	209 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	257 FPS	154 FPS
medium	214 FPS	131 FPS
high	167 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	175 FPS	77 FPS
medium	144 FPS	66 FPS
high	104 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	42 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open RTX A5000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
1080p
low	661 FPS	504 FPS
medium	555 FPS	438 FPS
high	420 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	375 FPS
medium	417 FPS	312 FPS
high	331 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	204 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	190 FPS
medium	220 FPS	163 FPS
high	188 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	113 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open RTX A5000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
1080p
low	929 FPS	893 FPS
medium	759 FPS	726 FPS
high	675 FPS	631 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	516 FPS
1440p
low	716 FPS	700 FPS
medium	586 FPS	564 FPS
high	509 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	493 FPS	480 FPS
medium	408 FPS	391 FPS
high	342 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	258 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open RTX A5000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
1080p
low	855 FPS	307 FPS
medium	784 FPS	268 FPS
high	684 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	679 FPS	238 FPS
medium	616 FPS	213 FPS
high	513 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	153 FPS
4K
low	489 FPS	145 FPS
medium	410 FPS	123 FPS
high	342 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	81 FPS

Open Quadro RTX A6000 Open RTX A5000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and RTX A5000

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

RTX A5000

The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 336 Tensor cores vs 256.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
G3D Mark Score	22,798	22,951
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	10752+31%	8192
Compute (TFLOPS)	38.71 TFLOPS+39%	27.77 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1800 MHz+6%	1695 MHz
ROPs	112+17%	96
TMUs	336+31%	256
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+31%	8 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	84+31%	64
Tensor Cores	336+31%	256

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+100%	24 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s	768 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit	384-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The RTX A5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX A5000
TDP	300W	230W-23%
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin EPS	8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	76.0	99.8+31%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. The RTX A5000 costs 20% less ($928 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the RTX A5000 offers 26.5% better value. The RTX A5000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).