G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (160 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅52.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅110% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 160).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

2021

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Why buy it

✅52.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅110% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 160).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (160 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile better than Quadro RTX A6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 1% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020 and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $4,649 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Quadro RTX A6000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro RTX A6000 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Quadro RTX A6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX A6000 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $4,649 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX A6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	132 FPS	270 FPS
medium	114 FPS	250 FPS
high	97 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	257 FPS
medium	88 FPS	214 FPS
high	70 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	175 FPS
medium	41 FPS	144 FPS
high	30 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	93 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Open Quadro RTX A6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	360 FPS	661 FPS
medium	315 FPS	555 FPS
high	263 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	361 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	489 FPS
medium	219 FPS	417 FPS
high	185 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	261 FPS
4K
low	131 FPS	255 FPS
medium	113 FPS	220 FPS
high	96 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	158 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Open Quadro RTX A6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	836 FPS	929 FPS
medium	683 FPS	759 FPS
high	592 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	513 FPS
1440p
low	648 FPS	716 FPS
medium	526 FPS	586 FPS
high	447 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	379 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	420 FPS	493 FPS
medium	338 FPS	408 FPS
high	272 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Open Quadro RTX A6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	290 FPS	855 FPS
medium	254 FPS	784 FPS
high	209 FPS	684 FPS
ultra	178 FPS	513 FPS
1440p
low	224 FPS	679 FPS
medium	201 FPS	616 FPS
high	167 FPS	513 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	489 FPS
medium	113 FPS	410 FPS
high	89 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile Open Quadro RTX A6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,025 points.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 23,025 and the Quadro RTX A6000 reaches 22,798 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 15.97 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 160 Tensor cores vs 336.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score	23,025	22,798
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5120	10752+110%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.97 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS+142%
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	1800 MHz+15%
ROPs	80	112+40%
TMUs	160	336+110%
L1 Cache	5 MB	10.5 MB+110%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	40	84+110%
Tensor Cores	160	336+110%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	768 GB/s+71%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile	Quadro RTX A6000
TDP	115W-62%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin EPS
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85
Perf/Watt	200.2+163%	76.0