
Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro M4000M
2015RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 100W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 100W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A500 Embedded GPU better than Quadro M4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,148 | 6,197 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1335 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.47 MB | 2 MB+326% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 20W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.5 | 309.9+404% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













