
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅38.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 192).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅38.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 192).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than RTX A4500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and RTX A4500

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 22,119 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 192 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,119+5% | 21,094 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 7168+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS+13% | 23.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 56+17% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 224+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 3.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 448 GB/s+4% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 110W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 58.1% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-45% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-67% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 201.1+91% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1699 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #47 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












