
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅55.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 144).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅55.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 144).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile better than RTX A4500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 811 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 661 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and RTX A4500

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 144 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,702 | 21,094+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 7168+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.62 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz+3% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 224+56% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 7 MB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 56+56% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 224+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 75% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 54% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-43% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+71% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1699 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #83 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












