G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅34.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 257.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅21.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 184).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
240.5% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅34.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 257.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅21.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 184).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
240.5% HIGHER MSRP
$1,699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX A4500?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 34.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 5.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3070 is about $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $1,699 MSRP, and you are getting 34.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 257.9%. RTX A4500 is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX A4500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?

Yes. RTX A4500 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $1,699 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3070 currently gives you 5.1% higher G3D Mark and 34.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 257.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

RTX A4500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
1080p
low	158 FPS	104 FPS
medium	140 FPS	88 FPS
high	123 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	82 FPS
medium	109 FPS	68 FPS
high	96 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	34 FPS
medium	67 FPS	31 FPS
high	52 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A4500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
1080p
low	470 FPS	441 FPS
medium	405 FPS	377 FPS
high	327 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	332 FPS
medium	246 FPS	276 FPS
high	213 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	184 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	166 FPS
medium	120 FPS	140 FPS
high	105 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	96 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A4500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
1080p
low	885 FPS	564 FPS
medium	712 FPS	477 FPS
high	619 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	339 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	442 FPS
medium	557 FPS	372 FPS
high	473 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	287 FPS
medium	388 FPS	237 FPS
high	330 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	149 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A4500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
1080p
low	600 FPS	174 FPS
medium	527 FPS	144 FPS
high	433 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	128 FPS
medium	433 FPS	109 FPS
high	339 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	75 FPS
medium	270 FPS	63 FPS
high	238 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open RTX A4500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX A4500

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 5.1%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 184 Tensor cores vs 224.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
G3D Mark Score	22,172+5%	21,094
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5888	7168+22%
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS	23.65 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+5%	1650 MHz
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	184	224+22%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB	7 MB+21%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	46	56+22%
Tensor Cores	184	224+22%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	448 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 9.5% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	RTX A4500
TDP	220W	200W-9%
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	8-pin	8-pin
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.8	105.5+5%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 70.6% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 258.1% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).