
L40S
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌575.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,389 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 556.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
L40S
2022RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,389 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 556.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌575.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is L40S better than RTX A4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and RTX A4000

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 568 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023+3% | 19,463 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+196% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+378% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+62% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+196% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+197% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+196% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+196% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The L40S offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 114.3% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+114% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 140W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 139.0+108% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The RTX A4000 costs 85.2% less ($6389 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 offers 548.1% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | L40S | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $1111-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 17.5+548% |
| Codename | AD102 | GA104 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #76 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












