RTX A1000 vs Tesla M40 24GB

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1462 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

2015Core: 948 MHzBoost: 1112 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,251 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 171.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
  • Measures 163mm instead of 267mm, a 104mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla M40 24GB

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 167% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
  • 63.8% longer card at 267mm vs 163mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A1000 better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Yes. RTX A1000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,814 vs 10,641 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX A1000 is a 2024 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Tesla M40 24GB is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A1000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX A1000 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $749 MSRP. RTX A1000 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX A1000 is about $1,251 cheaper on MSRP at $749 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $749 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (50W vs 250W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Tesla M40 24GB is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $2,000 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. RTX A1000 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
1080p
low107 FPS151 FPS
medium90 FPS130 FPS
high76 FPS106 FPS
ultra50 FPS65 FPS
1440p
low93 FPS121 FPS
medium77 FPS103 FPS
high56 FPS76 FPS
ultra37 FPS47 FPS
4K
low37 FPS42 FPS
medium34 FPS38 FPS
high21 FPS24 FPS
ultra17 FPS20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
1080p
low120 FPS248 FPS
medium97 FPS214 FPS
high76 FPS163 FPS
ultra57 FPS128 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS173 FPS
medium68 FPS142 FPS
high55 FPS115 FPS
ultra43 FPS89 FPS
4K
low53 FPS96 FPS
medium42 FPS78 FPS
high34 FPS65 FPS
ultra24 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
1080p
low487 FPS479 FPS
medium389 FPS383 FPS
high324 FPS319 FPS
ultra243 FPS239 FPS
1440p
low365 FPS359 FPS
medium292 FPS287 FPS
high243 FPS239 FPS
ultra182 FPS180 FPS
4K
low243 FPS239 FPS
medium195 FPS192 FPS
high162 FPS160 FPS
ultra122 FPS120 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
1080p
low243 FPS293 FPS
medium209 FPS252 FPS
high170 FPS210 FPS
ultra142 FPS163 FPS
1440p
low182 FPS217 FPS
medium159 FPS192 FPS
high125 FPS154 FPS
ultra102 FPS118 FPS
4K
low103 FPS120 FPS
medium85 FPS96 FPS
high69 FPS80 FPS
ultra54 FPS61 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 and Tesla M40 24GB

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX A1000 scores 10,814 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (RTX A1000) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1462 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
G3D Mark Score
10,814+2%
10,641
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS
6.832 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock
1462 MHz+31%
1112 MHz
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
192+167%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+109%
1.1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A1000 draws 50W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 163mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
TDP
50W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
163mm
267mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
216.3+408%
42.6
💰

Value Analysis

The RTX A1000 launched at $749 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The RTX A1000 costs 62.5% less ($1251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (RTX A1000) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the RTX A1000 offers 171.7% better value. The RTX A1000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureRTX A1000Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP
$749-63%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
14.4+172%
5.3
Codename
GA107
GM200
Release
April 16 2024
November 10 2015
Ranking
#251
#253