G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅116.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
❌192.7% longer card at 240mm vs 82mm.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 240mm, a 158mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅116.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 240mm, a 158mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
❌192.7% longer card at 240mm vs 82mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 116.2% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 11,009 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 105.7% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 116.2% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 105.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	177 FPS	105 FPS
medium	162 FPS	88 FPS
high	142 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	91 FPS
medium	118 FPS	75 FPS
high	101 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	36 FPS
medium	79 FPS	33 FPS
high	66 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	425 FPS	120 FPS
medium	359 FPS	97 FPS
high	292 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	88 FPS
medium	229 FPS	68 FPS
high	186 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	53 FPS
medium	95 FPS	42 FPS
high	77 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	855 FPS	495 FPS
medium	693 FPS	396 FPS
high	609 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	372 FPS
medium	527 FPS	297 FPS
high	452 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	248 FPS
medium	355 FPS	198 FPS
high	308 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	120 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	775 FPS	221 FPS
medium	639 FPS	188 FPS
high	558 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	172 FPS
medium	503 FPS	149 FPS
high	435 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	96 FPS
medium	322 FPS	75 FPS
high	298 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 11,009 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 105.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) with 136 Tensor cores vs 64.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	22,651+106%	11,009
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4352+113%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+372%	4.669 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+122%	1140 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+113%	64
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+115%	2 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+113%	16
Tensor Cores	136+113%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 128.2% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
TDP	160W	35W-78%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	82mm
Height	111mm	4mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	314.5+122%