
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 961.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅208.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1262.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 961.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅208.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 184).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1262.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 28.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 28,454+28% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 18176+209% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+348% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2505 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 96 | 192+100% |
| TMUs | 184 | 568+209% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 17.8 MB+207% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 142+209% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 568+209% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 960 GB/s+114% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+6% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 92.7% less ($6300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 957.1% better value. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-93% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+957% | 4.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












