
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅56.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅525% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 64).
Trade-offs
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅56.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅525% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 64).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU make more sense than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 251 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 251 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 126 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 251 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 11,153 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 400 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,153 | 11,162 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+525% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+687% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+26% | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 400+525% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+525% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+500% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+525% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+525% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+500% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 250W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.6 | 318.9+615% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












