
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 263.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌275.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,651 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 263.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅16.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌275.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4500 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than RTX 4500 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 and the RTX 4500 Ada Generation reaches 27,850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 27,850+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7680+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 39.63 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2580 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 240+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4500 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has 24 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+13% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-5% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+2% | 132.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 73.4% less ($1651 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 262.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-73% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+262% | 12.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD103 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #27 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












