
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+34% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 458.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,095 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌317.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+34% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 458.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 184).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,095 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌317.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 34%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 184 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+34% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+28% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+79% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+40% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+29% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 72+57% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 576+213% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 33.3% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-29% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+87% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 76% less ($1900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 461.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-76% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+461% | 8.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #32 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












