
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+114.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 615.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅+114.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 615.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,558 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Tesla T10?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T10 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Tesla T10

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 114.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+114% | 12,558 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+28% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+103% | 14.38 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+59% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 288+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla T10 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-23% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+179% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 612.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-70% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+613% | 6.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU102 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #32 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












