
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 915.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅30.7% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅139.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 184).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1068.4% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 915.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅30.7% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅139.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 184).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1068.4% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 697 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 15%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 184 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 30,968+15% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 14080+139% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+130% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+4% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 184 | 440+139% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 13.8 MB+138% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 96 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 110+139% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 440+139% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 103.2% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+103% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 96 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+30% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 91.4% less ($6400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 920.5% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-91% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+920% | 4.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB202 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












