
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅46.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌41.7% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅46.3% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌41.7% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 87.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 184 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+87% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+35% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+71% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+26% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+35% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+13% | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+35% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+13% | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 205.2+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 29.4% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 165.7% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-29% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+166% | 16.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB206 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #32 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












