
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+62% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 140W.
RTX A4500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 200W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,613 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX A4500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+62% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 200W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,613 vs 26,919).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX A4500 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX A4500 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 16,613 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 62%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 17.66 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+62% | 16,613 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+65% | 17.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+65% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 184 | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+800% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 140W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX A4500 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 140W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+13% | 118.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GA104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #32 | #119 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












