
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅53.6% more average FPS across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅53.6% more average FPS across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 170 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 15,073 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 78.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+79% | 15,073 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+109% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+143% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+16% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+109% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+107% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+200% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+109% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+109% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+200% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 120% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 3 | 1-67% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 301.5+124% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | AD107 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #32 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












