
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+62.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌122.7% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+62.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌122.7% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 62.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+62% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+34% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2655 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+75% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 19.2% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 165W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 240mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+34% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 55.1% less ($330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 37.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $269-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 61.6+37% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












