
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+105.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅+105.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 105.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+105% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+187% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2479 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+1060% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 241mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 241mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+23% | 109.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 14.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 138.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+139% | 18.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #32 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












