
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+258.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,500 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Quadro P4000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅+258.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,500 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Quadro P4000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Quadro P4000 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 7,500 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 258.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1228 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+259% | 7,500 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+229% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+562% | 4.401 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+102% | 1228 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+779% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Quadro P4000 Max-Q's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+79% | 75.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GP104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #32 | #298 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












