GeForce RTX 4070 vs L2

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

L2

2023Core: 1440 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz

Popular choices:

••••••RTX 4070•••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce RTX 4070

12 GB 200

26,919

+392.4%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 5070

GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

4 GB 275

5,467

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+392.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1544% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅+392.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1544% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
233.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than L2?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 5,467 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while L2 is a 2023 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 392.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $1,401 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 392.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1544%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is L2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. L2 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,000 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

L2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
1080p
low	183 FPS	202 FPS
medium	167 FPS	190 FPS
high	151 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	119 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	180 FPS
medium	124 FPS	148 FPS
high	110 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	88 FPS
medium	78 FPS	76 FPS
high	65 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open L2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
1080p
low	544 FPS	246 FPS
medium	454 FPS	197 FPS
high	353 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	185 FPS
medium	288 FPS	148 FPS
high	235 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	123 FPS
medium	144 FPS	98 FPS
high	125 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open L2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
1080p
low	884 FPS	246 FPS
medium	713 FPS	197 FPS
high	643 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	185 FPS
medium	549 FPS	148 FPS
high	483 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	123 FPS
medium	373 FPS	98 FPS
high	326 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open L2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
1080p
low	751 FPS	246 FPS
medium	612 FPS	197 FPS
high	536 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	185 FPS
medium	500 FPS	148 FPS
high	433 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	123 FPS
medium	324 FPS	98 FPS
high	301 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open L2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and L2

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

L2

The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 392.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 92 (L2) with 184 Tensor cores vs 368.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
G3D Mark Score	26,919+392%	5,467
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5888	11776+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS+104%
Boost Clock	2475 MHz	2520 MHz+2%
ROPs	64	128+100%
TMUs	184	368+100%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB	11.5 MB+98%
L2 Cache	36 MB	96 MB+167%
Ray Tracing Cores	46	92+100%
Tensor Cores	184	368+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the L2 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	36 MB	96 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
DirectX	12.2+2%	12_2
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the L2's 275W — a 31.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	L2
TDP	200W-27%	275W
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	304mm	168mm
Height	137mm	69mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	134.6+576%	19.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 70% less ($1401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1563% better value.