
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.3% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅11.3% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 17.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 184 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 31,578+17% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7680+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz | 2610 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 240+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 48 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 35.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 285mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-30% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 285mm |
| Height | 137mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+21% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 25% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 13.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-25% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+14% | 39.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD104 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












