
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅80.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅80.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 134.9%. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444 | 31,578+135% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+578% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2610 MHz+126% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 43.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 352 GB/s | 504 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 112.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-72% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1+52% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | TU104 | AD104 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #188 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













