G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $580 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 285W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅120.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
264.8% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
❌137.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 120W.
❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660

2019

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $580 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 285W, a 165W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅120.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
264.8% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
❌137.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 120W.
❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 120.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 11,639 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 1660 is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 171.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 264.8% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $219 MSRP, and you are getting 120.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 171.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1660 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1660 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1660 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $219 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	101 FPS	188 FPS
medium	89 FPS	171 FPS
high	78 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	151 FPS
medium	78 FPS	125 FPS
high	67 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	92 FPS
medium	44 FPS	79 FPS
high	33 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	197 FPS	664 FPS
medium	168 FPS	539 FPS
high	138 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	366 FPS
1440p
low	130 FPS	496 FPS
medium	105 FPS	400 FPS
high	86 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	269 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	250 FPS
medium	50 FPS	211 FPS
high	48 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	159 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	524 FPS	921 FPS
medium	419 FPS	742 FPS
high	346 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	393 FPS	720 FPS
medium	314 FPS	578 FPS
high	262 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	262 FPS	498 FPS
medium	210 FPS	403 FPS
high	164 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	296 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
1080p
low	364 FPS	879 FPS
medium	301 FPS	731 FPS
high	251 FPS	664 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	600 FPS
1440p
low	296 FPS	706 FPS
medium	243 FPS	585 FPS
high	192 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	150 FPS	477 FPS
medium	113 FPS	408 FPS
high	102 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	324 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 171.3%. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2610 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score	11,639	31,578+171%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1408	7680+445%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.027 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS+697%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz	2610 MHz+46%
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	88	240+173%
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	7.5 MB+436%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	48 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	504 GB/s+163%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	48 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 81.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP	120W-58%	285W
Recommended PSU	450W-36%	700W
Power Connector	8-pin	8-pin
Length	229mm	285mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	97.0	110.8+14%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 72.6% less ($580 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 34.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).