
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,480 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2465% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2502.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,480 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2465% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2502.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than GeForce GTX 1660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1660 make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 346 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 301 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and Tesla P40

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 11,808+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3840+173% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+17% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-52% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+106% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 96.2% less ($5480 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 2428.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-96% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+2429% | 2.1 |
| Codename | TU116 | GP102 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #231 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













