
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌112.8% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅21.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌112.8% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 57.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 136 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+58% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+30% | 17.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+30% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 205.2+45% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 53% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 236.1% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-53% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+236% | 16.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | GB206 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












