
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+167% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,485 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+167% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,485 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 382 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 8,485 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 167%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) with 136 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+167% | 8,485 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 5888+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+54% | 14.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+109% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 184+35% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 5.8 MB+35% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 46+35% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 184+35% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+33% | 106.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | GA104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












