
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+91.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 380.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅41.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+91.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 380.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅41.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A4000H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4000H still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A4000H

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 91.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 136 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+92% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+15% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+63% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 192+41% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 6 MB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 48+41% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 192+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 55.6% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 140W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+68% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 381.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+381% | 11.8 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












