
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 358.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅30.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅76.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 358.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅30.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅76.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4500 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX 4500 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 4500 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 27,850 — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation leads by 23%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) with 136 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 27,850+23% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 7680+76% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 39.63 TFLOPS+80% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2580 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 7.5 MB+74% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 240+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4500 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has 24 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — a 55.6% advantage for the RTX 4500 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 48 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 27% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-24% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+7% | 132.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 82.3% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 358.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+358% | 12.4 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD103 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #27 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












