G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌45.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅0.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅70.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 136).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 160W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅0.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅70.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 136).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 160W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌45.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 110W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile averages 0.3% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 22,651 vs 22,167 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (110W vs 160W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (22,167 vs 22,651). GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. The trade-off is that RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (22,167 vs 22,651) and 0.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	177 FPS	163 FPS
medium	162 FPS	150 FPS
high	142 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	138 FPS
medium	118 FPS	115 FPS
high	101 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	80 FPS
medium	79 FPS	68 FPS
high	66 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	46 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	425 FPS	422 FPS
medium	359 FPS	365 FPS
high	292 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	326 FPS
medium	229 FPS	272 FPS
high	186 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	179 FPS
medium	95 FPS	155 FPS
high	77 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	108 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	855 FPS	870 FPS
medium	693 FPS	712 FPS
high	609 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	691 FPS
medium	527 FPS	561 FPS
high	452 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	374 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	470 FPS
medium	355 FPS	383 FPS
high	308 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	249 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	775 FPS	459 FPS
medium	639 FPS	408 FPS
high	558 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	381 FPS
medium	503 FPS	340 FPS
high	435 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	242 FPS
medium	322 FPS	221 FPS
high	298 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,651+2%	22,167
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352	7424+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+52%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	136	232+71%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB	7.3 MB+70%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	34	58+71%
Tensor Cores	136	232+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	432 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 37% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	160W	110W-31%
Recommended PSU	550W	150W-73%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	201.5+42%