
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌56.6% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅29.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $226 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌56.6% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 2000 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 733 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 164 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 2000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 17,147 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 32.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) with 136 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+32% | 17,147 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+55% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+84% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+19% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136+55% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+54% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+55% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 136+55% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 245.0+73% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 36.2% less ($226 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 107.3% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-36% | $625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+107% | 27.4 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #59 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












