G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅195.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅195.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega M GH?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 195.1% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 6,548 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX Vega M GH is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 245.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 195.1% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 245.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX Vega M GH still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega M GH is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	177 FPS	82 FPS
medium	162 FPS	70 FPS
high	142 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	72 FPS
medium	118 FPS	63 FPS
high	101 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	26 FPS
medium	79 FPS	24 FPS
high	66 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	425 FPS	201 FPS
medium	359 FPS	168 FPS
high	292 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	148 FPS
medium	229 FPS	124 FPS
high	186 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	78 FPS
medium	95 FPS	66 FPS
high	77 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	855 FPS	295 FPS
medium	693 FPS	236 FPS
high	609 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	221 FPS
medium	527 FPS	177 FPS
high	452 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	147 FPS
medium	355 FPS	118 FPS
high	308 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	73 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	775 FPS	148 FPS
medium	639 FPS	122 FPS
high	558 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	109 FPS
medium	503 FPS	90 FPS
high	435 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	63 FPS
medium	322 FPS	50 FPS
high	298 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 6,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 245.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	22,651+246%	6,548
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+183%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+503%	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+113%	1190 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136+42%	96
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+1032%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GH lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega M GH relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+41%	204.8 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	1024-bit+700%
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12.2+2%	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
TDP	160W	100W-38%
Recommended PSU	550W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	240mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+116%	65.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).