G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 103.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega 64?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 45.8% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 13,949 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX Vega 64 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 62.4% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting 45.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 62.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 103.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega 64 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	177 FPS	141 FPS
medium	162 FPS	126 FPS
high	142 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	122 FPS
medium	118 FPS	100 FPS
high	101 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	68 FPS
medium	79 FPS	57 FPS
high	66 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	425 FPS	317 FPS
medium	359 FPS	279 FPS
high	292 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	215 FPS
medium	229 FPS	187 FPS
high	186 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	128 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	103 FPS
medium	95 FPS	88 FPS
high	77 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	855 FPS	628 FPS
medium	693 FPS	502 FPS
high	609 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	314 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	471 FPS
medium	527 FPS	377 FPS
high	452 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	235 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	314 FPS
medium	355 FPS	251 FPS
high	308 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	157 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	775 FPS	391 FPS
medium	639 FPS	347 FPS
high	558 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	314 FPS
medium	503 FPS	279 FPS
high	435 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	200 FPS
medium	322 FPS	188 FPS
high	298 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	127 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 13,949 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 62.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	22,651+62%	13,949
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+6%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+74%	12.66 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+64%	1546 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	256+88%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 68.1% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	484 GB/s+68%
Bus Width	128-bit	2048-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 59.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega 64
TDP	160W-46%	295W
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+199%	47.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 102.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).