
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅15.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7900M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7900M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+1% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+75% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+21% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+43% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 330W-40% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+14% | 124.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












