
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+41.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+41.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,984 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7800M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7800M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7800M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 15,984 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 41.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon RX 7800M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+42% | 15,984 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+13% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+9% | 2335 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 7800M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-11% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+59% | 88.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #59 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












