GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7700

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 19.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
  • Draws 160W instead of 190W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 7700

2023

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • 12.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 190W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7700?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 19.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $50 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and you are getting 19.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon RX 7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon RX 7700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $449 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low177 FPS210 FPS
medium162 FPS192 FPS
high142 FPS169 FPS
ultra124 FPS153 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS192 FPS
medium118 FPS160 FPS
high101 FPS134 FPS
ultra93 FPS125 FPS
4K
low93 FPS125 FPS
medium79 FPS104 FPS
high66 FPS82 FPS
ultra59 FPS75 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low425 FPS374 FPS
medium359 FPS319 FPS
high292 FPS249 FPS
ultra237 FPS198 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS229 FPS
medium229 FPS197 FPS
high186 FPS156 FPS
ultra154 FPS126 FPS
4K
low117 FPS106 FPS
medium95 FPS89 FPS
high77 FPS73 FPS
ultra60 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low855 FPS838 FPS
medium693 FPS684 FPS
high609 FPS600 FPS
ultra510 FPS498 FPS
1440p
low660 FPS643 FPS
medium527 FPS520 FPS
high452 FPS443 FPS
ultra382 FPS374 FPS
4K
low447 FPS441 FPS
medium355 FPS355 FPS
high308 FPS298 FPS
ultra255 FPS240 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
1080p
low775 FPS602 FPS
medium639 FPS514 FPS
high558 FPS441 FPS
ultra492 FPS352 FPS
1440p
low613 FPS465 FPS
medium503 FPS394 FPS
high435 FPS320 FPS
ultra378 FPS258 FPS
4K
low375 FPS291 FPS
medium322 FPS268 FPS
high298 FPS232 FPS
ultra255 FPS189 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 7700

The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 and the Radeon RX 7700 reaches 22,146 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 136 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
G3D Mark Score
22,651+2%
22,146
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
4352+113%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+8%
20.48 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
2600 MHz+3%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
136+6%
128
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+760%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
34+6%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 116.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
624 GB/s+117%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 17.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
TDP
160W-16%
190W
Recommended PSU
550W-15%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
240mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+21%
116.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 11.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 49.3 (Radeon RX 7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 15.2% better value.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 7700
MSRP
$399-11%
$449
Performance per Dollar
56.8+15%
49.3
Codename
AD106
Navi 33
Release
May 18 2023
January 4 2023
Ranking
#59
#140