
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+36.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌48.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+36.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌48.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 36.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+37% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2655 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+6% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 3.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-3% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+41% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 32.6% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 8.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $269-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 61.6+8% |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












