G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 335W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6950 XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 6950 XT

2022

Why buy it

✅10.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
175.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,099 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌109.4% higher power demand at 335W vs 160W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 6950 XT

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 122.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 335W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅10.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6950 XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌
175.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,099 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌109.4% higher power demand at 335W vs 160W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6950 XT better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon RX 6950 XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 10.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 24% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6950 XT is about 175.4% more expensive on MSRP at $1,099 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 10.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 24.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6950 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than Radeon RX 6950 XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (160W vs 335W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6950 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6950 XT currently gives you 24.0% higher G3D Mark and 10.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6950 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
1080p
low	177 FPS	259 FPS
medium	162 FPS	237 FPS
high	142 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	242 FPS
medium	118 FPS	200 FPS
high	101 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	171 FPS
medium	79 FPS	143 FPS
high	66 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6950 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
1080p
low	425 FPS	667 FPS
medium	359 FPS	550 FPS
high	292 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	455 FPS
medium	229 FPS	372 FPS
high	186 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	216 FPS
medium	95 FPS	184 FPS
high	77 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	127 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6950 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
1080p
low	855 FPS	924 FPS
medium	693 FPS	767 FPS
high	609 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	714 FPS
medium	527 FPS	587 FPS
high	452 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	500 FPS
medium	355 FPS	413 FPS
high	308 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6950 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
1080p
low	775 FPS	708 FPS
medium	639 FPS	572 FPS
high	558 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	584 FPS
medium	503 FPS	477 FPS
high	435 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	368 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	377 FPS
medium	322 FPS	324 FPS
high	298 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	261 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6950 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6950 XT

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6950 XT

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 28,076 — the Radeon RX 6950 XT leads by 24%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6950 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
G3D Mark Score	22,651	28,076+24%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352	5120+18%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	23.8 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+9%	2324 MHz
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	136	320+135%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	80+135%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6950 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	576 GB/s+100%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs RDNA 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	RDNA 2
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	RDNA 2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 335W — a 70.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 83°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6950 XT
TDP	160W-52%	335W
Recommended PSU	550W-35%	850W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-16%	83°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+69%	83.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 63.7% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.5 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 122.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).